The women's draw is gutted, and if Serena was going to get her 24th slam, this tournament is as good as any.
Hearing some of the commentators talk about how Coco Gauff is destined for winning Slams makes me wonder. She has an incredibly complete game for her age (in comparison, I described Sloane Stephens as "a work in progress" when she was 18), but I'm thinking that actually works against her. She doesn't have a weapon that makes me go "wow!" and that can be developed with some experience. I mean, she's got the athleticism and maybe that's enough these days, but I don't think it's as much of a sure thing as the commentators say.
Maybe I'm being too critical. Maybe I'm not giving credit where it's due when Kerber, Halep, Kenin, and Wozniacki are all slam champions (though I would strongly argue that nobody thought Kerber or Kenin would get a slam until after they did while Halep and Wozniacki making multiple slam finals until it happened gave you a sense that they just needed a little luck to go their way). Maybe it's just that commentators have to speak in absolutes to make interesting TV.